RolomineSign inFree scan · $39 to unlock

Example report

This is what $39 gets you.

A worked example, start to finish, for someone pursuing three things at once. The people below are invented. Your report contains your own connections, judged against your own goals, in exactly this shape.

The three goals in this scan

CustomersOnboarding toolWorkflow software for mid-size logistics firms
PartnersAgency partnersConsultancies advising the same operations teams
InvestorsSeed roundRaising $500k pre-seed
3,284connections read
64potential customers
23potential partners
11investors
Tomás Berg
Head of RevOps · Nightjar Health [~201-1000 staff, Healthcare, Germany] · connected 2013
customer

Owns the revenue stack at a company squarely in your size band; connected twelve years ago and never followed up.

Found on the web

Nightjar Health announced a Series B in March and has posted four operations roles since. Berg moved into the role in 2024 from a similar job at a competitor.

Onboarding toolCustomersPURSUE

RevOps owns the vendor-onboarding process you replace, and at 200 to 1000 staff that process is painful enough to have a budget line. Fresh funding and four open ops roles both point at a team stretching past its current tooling. Twelve years of goodwill is worth more than a cold email to the same title elsewhere.

Suggested opening · yours to edit

Tomás, we connected back in 2013 and I have been hopeless at keeping up. I saw Nightjar has been hiring across ops since the raise; that is usually the point where vendor onboarding stops fitting in a spreadsheet. That is the bit I have been building for. Worth fifteen minutes to tell me whether it is a real problem for you, or is it handled?

Seed roundInvestorsSKIP

He runs revenue operations at an operating company and deploys no capital. A warm customer conversation is worth far more here than an awkward funding one, and asking for both in the same message would cost you the first.

Elena Vaszary
Founder · Trellis Studio [~11-50 staff, Operations consultancy, Hungary] · connected 2019
partner

Runs a 14-person consultancy serving the operations teams you sell to; too small to buy, well placed to refer.

Agency partnersPartnersPURSUE

Trellis advises exactly the operations teams you are selling to, and sells services rather than software, so recommending you costs her nothing and makes her own delivery easier. At 14 people she can decide to refer you over a coffee rather than through a partner programme.

Suggested opening · yours to edit

Elena, it has been since 2019, which is far too long. You work with the same operations teams I am building for, and I suspect you hit the vendor-onboarding mess on most engagements. I am not looking to sell you anything. I would like to know whether it comes up, and if it does, whether having something to point at would be useful to you.

Onboarding toolCustomersSKIP

Fourteen people, and the process you automate barely exists at that size. She is worth far more as a route to her clients than as a customer, and pitching her the product would spend the relationship on the smaller prize.

Dana Whitlock
Partner · Ridgeline Capital [~11-50 staff, Venture capital, United States] · connected 2021
investor

Writes first cheques in your category; connected after an introduction you never followed up on.

Found on the web

Ridgeline closed a $180m fund in January and has led three seed rounds in operations software since. Whitlock is named on two of them.

Seed roundInvestorsPURSUE

A new fund with a stated operations-software thesis and two relevant deals under her name, which puts your raise squarely inside what she is already buying. The 2021 connection came from a mutual introduction that never went anywhere, so this is a reintroduction rather than a cold approach, and you now have the traction that conversation was missing.

Suggested opening · yours to edit

Dana, we were introduced back in 2021 and I never followed up properly, which was a mistake. I have since built something in the operations-software space Ridgeline has been active in, and we are at a point where the numbers are worth showing rather than describing. Would you be open to a short call, or is there someone on the team who looks at this stage?

Agency partnersPartnersSKIP

She could in principle introduce portfolio companies, but a fund partner is not a referral channel and treating her as one wastes the more valuable conversation. Ask for the money, not the introductions.

Example data. These people and companies do not exist. Every claim in a real report is derived from your export, identified employer facts, or a web search with the source attached.

The point of running more than one

The same person, two different answers.

Look at Dana Whitlock above. PURSUE for the raise, SKIP for partnerships, with the reason given: a fund partner is not a referral channel, and treating her as one costs you the more valuable conversation. Elena is the mirror image, worth more as a route to her clients than as a customer. That distinction is the whole reason to state your goal rather than describe your company.

The other half

And the companies you know nobody at.

The report also works in reverse: companies matching the profile you described where your network reaches no one. No warm route in, which is precisely why it is worth knowing they exist.

Halden Freight
~201-1000 staff · Logistics · Germany
Customers

Sits squarely in your stated 100 to 1000 band in the industry you named, and vendor onboarding at that size is a standing process rather than an occasional job. You have no connection there at all.

Northgate Seed
~11-50 staff · Venture capital · United Kingdom
Investors

Writes pre-seed cheques in the size band you are raising, with a stated interest in operations tooling. Nobody in your export works there, so this is a cold approach or an introduction to find.

And the rest of it

Plus every other match, as a spreadsheet.

The report above is the readable half. The CSV underneath it has one row per person per goal: rank, name, company, title, connection year, profile URL, category, score, the reasoning and the opening message. Filter it to investors, pursue, and work down the list.

Scan my network, free

See your counts and your strongest matches before deciding.